Life-Sustaining Treatment: Utilitarian View

Table of Contents

Introduction

Contemporary society faces many moral issues in diverse spheres. They can be personal or global, practical or theoretical, but they all demand making a decision by a person who came across a moral dilemma. Healthcare is a sphere with some burning moral issues that cause active discussions. For example, the problem of life-sustaining treatment in case there is no chance for improvement implies both ethical and moral aspects. This paper presents the moral issue of ending life-sustaining treatment, applies the principle of utilitarianism to support the decision about this problem, and regards Bentham’s Felicific Calculus.

Moral Issue Summary

The moral issue under consideration is about the patient after an accident. The young man receives life-support treatment, but his brain was declared dead. Therefore, there is no chance for recovery even though other organs are healthy. Healthcare provider considers further treatment to be unreasonable and suggests to switch off life support. The parents of the patient are religious and refuse this action considering it to be similar to murder or suicide. Still, representatives of the healthcare provider explain the difference between withdrawal of the ventilator, suicide, and euthanasia (Welie and Have 1).

The family promises to make their decision after some time. Moreover, since his organs are functioning and healthy, the young man can become a donor and save lives of other people who are waiting for transplantation. Finally, the parents agree to stop life support of their son although it was a difficult moral decision. Also, they allowed transplantation of his healthy organs.

Applying the Principle of Utilitarianism

From the point of view of Utilitarianism, the action or decision is right as long as it brings happiness (Westacott). Thus, the morality of a decision depends on its consequences. The moral issue under discussion is controversial in terms of Utilitarianism. On the one hand, the decision of parents to stop life support of their son and their agreement for transplantation will bring happiness to patients who have been waiting for organs as well as their relatives. On the other hand, the parents themselves can feel bad and not happy because they did not manage to save their son. Nevertheless, considering the fact that more people benefit from their decision about the moral issue than could have been in case they insisted on life support, their action is right under the principle of Utilitarianism.

Application of Bentham’s Felicific Calculus

Another issue related to happiness measurement is Bentham’s Felicific Calculus. He also addresses the principles of utility in his work (Brunon-Ernst 2). His Felicific Calculus was aimed at the assessment of pain and pleasure units thus calculating the level of happiness. Applying this calculus to the discussed moral issue, the following considerations should be made. As for intensity of pleasure and pain, pleasure of the patients who receive organs is greater than pain of the patient’s parents. Also, pleasure of their healthy lives will last longer. As for the number of people affected, more of them will be happy than unhappy. Consequently, the decision about the moral issue is correct and will bring happiness to many people.

Conclusion

On the whole, moral issues imply complicated processes of decision-making. It is important to evaluate the possible outcomes in case of different decisions. The Utilitarian principle and concepts discussed by Bentham can empower the decision-making and allow people to evaluate their decision from the point of view of happiness it brings.

Works Cited

Brunon-Ernst, Anne. “The Felicific Calculus. Jeremy Bentham’s Definition of Happiness.” Well-Being: Towards a Cross-Cultural Definition: Proceedings of a Conference Held January 2014 at Université Panthéon-Assas Paris, 2014, pp. 1-14.

Welie, Jos, and Henk Have. “The Ethics of Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Theoretical Considerations and Clinical Decision-Making.” Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-8.

Westacott, Emrys. “The Basic Principles of Utilitarianism.” ThoughtCo. Web.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with My Homework Geeks
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live ChatWhatsApp